Recently I heard a report on NPR about reading in America. Since I was driving while listening to the report I wasn't confident I heard what I thought I did. So, in the week the world wide web turned 25, I searched on Google for "reading statistics."
This is what I found: - Percent of U.S. high school grads who will never read a book after high school 33% - Percent of college students who will never read a book after they graduate 42% - Total percentage of U.S. families who did not buy a book in 2013 80% Fortunately, several weeks ago I met with a local book club to discuss my novel, Murphy's Troubles. I was invited to attend their discussion and was even asked to lead the discussion. I prepared background material on Ireland, talked about my path to write and publish the book and then prepared a series of questions to spark discussion. Two members of the group had traveled to Ireland and two others had Irish heritage. I asked the members to be frank with me because that's how I grow as a writer. They were frank but not unkind. I was surprised how some of the club members reacted to various characters in the novel. We talked together for just over two hours. As an author there is nothing better than sharing the experience of your book with readers. The data shows we are not a book reading nation, however, there are enclaves of book clubs that maintain a fierce devotion to books whether hard copy, trade paperback or ebooks. It's generally accepted that during the Dark Ages Irish monks saved the knowledge of Europe by copying and maintainng books. Book clubs are keeping reading and discourse alive and well and by doing so saving the world.
1 Comment
Self-Publishing in the Digital Age
Plus a short Reading from Murphy's Troubles by Rex Owens 7:00 p.m. Wednesday March 19, 2014 Beans n Cream Coffeehouse 345 Cannery Square, Sun Prairie, WI I am working on my second novel and having a bad time of it. Writing my second novel some days I feel like Sisyphus. My first novel took fourteen years to write and I worked on in in bits and pieces with UW-Madison Writer's Institute classes; UW-Madison's Weekend with your novel; , UW-Madison's critique groups; and, UW-Madison's Writers by the Lake. I did it this way because I was still in the work-a-day world and used these special classes to devote myself to writing in short, intense bursts of learning, energy and creativity. In those days I thought being free from the stardard job would be a panacea for my writing life.
My career ended abruptly one Friday morning when I learned that my managers' salary was dragging the company I worked for into the financial abyss, twelve others got the same news that day. I am fortunate to have a pension so financial security was ensured and I saw this change as my chance to finally finish my first novel. Murphy's Troubles was published in November 2013, it had taken four years. I've finally settled on what to write for my second novel, only because the protagonist, Ian Murphy scolded me in a dream and said he wasn't finished telling his story. My working title for the second novel is: There Was Sadness, There was Joy. As I began to write I discovered I don't have a writing routine. I have complete control of my time and yet I struggle to develop any sort of writing routine. The entire book is in my head, of that I am certain. I found myself obsessing with chapter one, which has been written and re-written at least 25 times. There is some part of me that has to have the first chapter exactly right before I can move on. So, I'm accepting that as part of my writing routine. I've also been indecisive about point of view, that demon that haunts me whenever I splash a work across the screen of my lap top. Just this week I've settled on first person point of view. While some consider it limiting, it allows a more personal, in depth story. I want to see the world only through Ian Murphy's eyes because that's the only way I can convey it on the page - the way Ian wants the story told. I will be working on having a writing routine for a long time to come. Who knows, maybe my routine is not have a routine. I know there's a lot of advice to just sit down at the keyboard every day, same time, and do my thing. That approach seems to be common among writers. For me, it doesn't feel right; maybe I'm fighting the self-discipline it takes. So, a lot of days I feel like Sisyphus, pushing the boulder up the mountain only to watch the boulder roll down and do it again tomorrow. A few weeks ago I was talking with a friend about a book that our community will read together. Our library director is initiating a program called Sun Prairie Reads this year which kicks off in late March. The book selected is a young adult fiction, Seedfolks, by Paul Fleischman which is a Newbery Medal winning novel. I talked about the structure of the book, how the story built into a crescendo and how characters lives were woven together. My friend looked at me and said: "As a writer you read differently than I do. I just liked the story."
His comment caused be to reflect on my reading life. He was right, having completed the process of writing, editing and publishing a novel I do read differently that I did before that experience. In the past I consumed Ray Bradbury novels, not for the science fiction, but the story. I'll read any Wallace Stegner for his language and common life stories like going home after a lifetime away and learning about yourself. When writers are asked for advice they often say that you need to read, deeply, exhaustively, in all genres. In many ways this advice is self-evident. I can't imagine a writer who doesn't also love to read. I must confess that I don't read all genres. I skip erotica, non-fiction, paranormal and dystopia just from personal preference, no judgment intended or implied. I tendy to rely on my Tuesday Morning Book Club to introduce me to literature I might not choose for myself and that has proven very satisfactory. This month I read my first Russell Banks, Continental Drift. I don't know how I reached my age and be ignorant of Russell Banks. Continental Drift was nominated for the Pulitzer and if I had voted it would have won. I must admit that the point of view Banks uses initially confused me. I felt like I was watching a movie about Robert Raymond Dubois and Vanise Dorsinvilles. For perspective I contacted my friend and mentor Marshall Cook. He suggested that the point of view was intentional because both characters often are just observers in their own life. Eureka! Reading Continental Drift taught me a lesson as a writer. I'm working on my second novel and my worst problem, point of view, has reared its' ugly head in chapter one. Reading Banks' book gave me a solution to my point of view problem. So I agree with my friend that, as an author, I do read books from a wrtier's perspective, and that's just fine. |
rex owensI write to tell the story of our human saga. Categories
All
Archives
May 2021
|